Social policy – Sociology Eso Science http://www.sociologyesoscience.com/ Wed, 21 Jul 2021 12:13:23 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.8 https://www.sociologyesoscience.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/favicon-6-150x150.png Social policy – Sociology Eso Science http://www.sociologyesoscience.com/ 32 32 Hungary announces referendum on controversial LGBTQ law | LGBTQ News https://www.sociologyesoscience.com/hungary-announces-referendum-on-controversial-lgbtq-law-lgbtq-news/ Wed, 21 Jul 2021 11:45:14 +0000 https://www.sociologyesoscience.com/hungary-announces-referendum-on-controversial-lgbtq-law-lgbtq-news/ Prime Minister Viktor Orban calls for a public vote on new legislation following a legal challenge by the European Commission. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban has announced his intention to call a referendum on a controversial LGBTQ law after the European Commission launched legal action against his government for the measure. The legislation, which came […]]]>

Prime Minister Viktor Orban calls for a public vote on new legislation following a legal challenge by the European Commission.

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban has announced his intention to call a referendum on a controversial LGBTQ law after the European Commission launched legal action against his government for the measure.

The legislation, which came into effect this month, prohibits the use of material considered to promote homosexuality and gender change in schools. This has caused anxiety within Hungary’s LGBTQ community, sparked contempt across Europe and increased friction between the Hungarian government and the commission, the executive body of the European Union.

Stepping up Hungary’s battle with the commission as he announced the planned referendum, Orban on Wednesday accused the body of abusing its powers by launching an infringement case against the legislation last week, which could block funding of the EU for Hungary.

“The future of our children is at stake, so we cannot back down on this issue,” Orban said in a video posted to Facebook.

“In recent weeks, Brussels has clearly attacked Hungary for its child protection law. Hungarian laws do not allow sexual propaganda in kindergartens, schools, on television and in advertisements, ”he added.

Orban urges Hungarians to vote ‘no’

The law has been presented by the Hungarian government as a way to protect children, but opponents argue that it confuses pedophilia with homosexuality and stigmatizes LGBTQ people.

Orban, a die-hard nationalist, did not announce a date for the planned referendum, but said he would include five questions.

This would include asking Hungarians whether they support the holding of workshops on sexual orientation in schools without their consent, or whether they believe that gender reassignment procedures should be encouraged among children.

Orban said questions would also include whether content that could affect children’s sexual orientation should be shown without any restrictions, or that gender reassignment procedures should also be made available to children.

He urged all participants to answer “No” to the questions.

The Prime Minister, in power since 2010 and facing elections next April, presents himself as a defender of the traditional Christian values ​​of Western liberalism.

He has become increasingly radical on social policy in recent times, denouncing LGBTQ people, migrants and refugees as part of his self-proclaimed illiberal approach to governance.

EU calls bill “shameful”

The European Commission did not immediately comment on Orban’s plan to hold a referendum.

The body said the law violated EU rules on the rights to free speech, as well as free trade and the provision of services.

Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen previously called the bill a “disgrace” and said the EU executive would use “all available powers” to force Hungary to repeal or change the law.

The infringement procedure initiated by the body comprises several stages and could last for years to end up in the European Court of Justice, which could impose financial penalties.

Hungary has two months to respond to the arguments put forward by the committee before the procedure takes the next step.


Source link

]]>
The transatlantic relationship – Social Europe https://www.sociologyesoscience.com/the-transatlantic-relationship-social-europe/ Tue, 20 Jul 2021 20:24:59 +0000 https://www.sociologyesoscience.com/the-transatlantic-relationship-social-europe/ Our project partner The end of Donald Trump’s administration in Washington provided an opportunity to turn the page on a transatlantic relationship that had been poisoned by Trump’s personal authoritarianism and the pursuit of an “America first” policy on everything, from trade to NATO. It can also allow a closer relationship than under the previous […]]]>

Our project partner

The end of Donald Trump’s administration in Washington provided an opportunity to turn the page on a transatlantic relationship that had been poisoned by Trump’s personal authoritarianism and the pursuit of an “America first” policy on everything, from trade to NATO. It can also allow a closer relationship than under the previous administration of Barack Obama, who preferred to “pivot” towards the Pacific.

Following the Social Europe series supported by the Friedrich Ebert Foundation On the 2020 elections, this new series takes a look at how U.S.-European relations could and should evolve over the next few years, up to two Democratic presidential terms, through a series of questions . Often, especially from a “realistic” perspective of international relations, the relationship is conceived narrowly in terms of security, with taken-for-granted Cold War-derived assumptions as to what those terms should be.

Our new approach addresses security, yes, but from the perspective of how US and European institutions and social movements can work together to advance human security in a polycentric world, such as preventing and containing new ones. global pandemics, recognizing that the main competitors in this context are what has become a rogue state in Russia under Vladimir Putin and the party-state dictatorship in China under Xi Jinping (the two figures are now constitutionally entrenched as as life presidents). Can a new “world public opinion” form behind the universal norms of democracy, human rights and the rule of law which transformed the “black continent” of Europe into a haven of peace after 1945 , bypassing vetoes of blocking Russia and China, derived from the post-war balance of power, at the United Nations – and in the pursuit of the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals by 2030?

On a related note, the series focuses on the existential challenge for humanity posed by accelerating climate change – on which, again, over the next decade dramatic action is essential, such as indicates science. The good news is that the disastrous stalemate between the United States and China at the United Nations climate summit in Copenhagen in 2009 was replaced by the agreement led by the Europeans in Paris in 2015. It was not not enough for science and yet too much for Trump after his election the following year. But one of Biden’s first steps as president was to re-engage in the Paris agreement, and winning the race against climate catastrophe clearly depends on the highest level of transatlantic cooperative ambition, including in support of the help the developing world to take a different approach. path of the main carbon polluters.

A collaborative rather than protectionist approach to trade will also be explored. A proposed transatlantic trade and investment partnership met with considerable public opposition in Europe over trade-related intellectual property rights and private courts open to corporate complainants and was dropped anyway when Trump took office. Should this program be reopened, so as to positively protect labor and environmental standards and enable trade? And will Biden’s “Made in America” push easily adapt to that?

Another dimension includes the challenges of taxing the rent-seeking behavior of the big tech companies that are now taking over the world. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said the administration wanted to reverse the “race to the bottom on corporate taxation” because of how multinational corporations can play with a corporate tax system. Nation state – on which Social Europe also directed a recent series. What kind of combination of minimum taxation and ‘digital tax’ is possible to capture some of these huge rents and how would it be coordinated between the two sides of the Atlantic, especially since this would essentially apply only to American companies?

Finally, the post-war generation in Western Europe and North America experienced hitherto unknown (internal) prosperity and peace, it is now clear, in large part thanks to a transatlantic commitment to common goals: full employment (for men) supported by Keynesian demand management, allied to insurance or tax-based welfare states, within the overall framework of the stable macroeconomic order established at Bretton Woods. This order has been steadily undone by the ‘supply’ economy treating unemployment as voluntary, replacing generous fiscal policy with strict monetary policy, and the collapse of fixed exchange rates, while the political pendulum moved from social democracy to neoliberal conservatism.

As in the interwar years, unregulated markets inexorably led to financial bubbles and a crash, the associated insecurity fostering authoritarian populism in its wake. Now that populism is once again on the decline on both sides of the Atlantic, can we rebuild a progressive political alliance? And can it cope with today’s more complex agenda, encompassing not only conventional post-war socio-economic concerns, but also cultural and political issues, particularly focusing on gender, ethnicity? and sexual orientation? The other agendas in this series should depend on it.


Source link

]]>
The EESC supports an open, sustainable and assertive EU trade policy https://www.sociologyesoscience.com/the-eesc-supports-an-open-sustainable-and-assertive-eu-trade-policy/ Tue, 20 Jul 2021 08:29:00 +0000 https://www.sociologyesoscience.com/the-eesc-supports-an-open-sustainable-and-assertive-eu-trade-policy/ At the July plenary session of the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC), President Christa Schweng and members met with leading speakers to discuss the future of the European economy after the pandemic. Economic prosperity, respect for the environment and human well-being can and must go hand in hand. This was the key message delivered […]]]>

At the July plenary session of the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC), President Christa Schweng and members met with leading speakers to discuss the future of the European economy after the pandemic.

Economic prosperity, respect for the environment and human well-being can and must go hand in hand. This was the key message delivered by EESC President Christa Schweng during the debate on A post-COVID economy at the service of all – Towards a well-being economy? held during the EESC plenary session on 7 July 2021.

Schweng argued that in the future we clearly need to monitor and assess broader aspects than those reflected in the GDP more effectively: “Aspects like our health, our nature, our education, our ability to innovate and our communities. count, ”she said.

Referring to “combining the idea of ​​prosperity with the possibility of social progress on a global scale”, with the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals as a foundation, she added: “The time has come for the EU to work on a comprehensive strategy: the EESC is ready to support reflection on the foundations of a post-COVID economy that works for all and includes new indicators of economic performance and social progress that can provide a complete picture of the good- to be people. “

Beyond GDP: Towards a Well-Being Economy

Four distinguished speakers took part in the plenary debate.

Tim jackson, from the Center for Understanding Sustainable Prosperity, made it clear that it is health – not wealth – that is the foundation for prosperity and the foundation for thinking about what kind of economy we want after the pandemic. He stressed that GDP has many limits and that it is important to break the “dependence on GDP growth” and start thinking about how social protection systems could be sustained in economies that do not. do not have the expected level of growth.

Fabrice Murtin, from the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), argued that the welfare in itself was a very complex system and there was not one welfare economy but many economies. He stressed that it was vital to start developing people-centered policies and that social inequality was a systemic weakness and reduced effectiveness.

According to Sandrine Dixson, representing the Club of Rome, it was crucial to focus on healthy people within a healthy Europe and to move from GDP-based growth to well-being and security. Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic could be used to understand what was essential and make changes.

To finish, James watson, from Business Europe, said GDP was originally intended as a measure of business activity, but it still makes sense to use it despite its limitations. The way forward would be to complete it with a broader and balanced scoreboard made up of other indicators such as economic, social and environmental indicators.

A human-centered economy

Speaking during the debate, Séamus Boland, president of the Diversity Europe Group, underlined that societal progress and an economy that works for all can only be achieved through a transition to an alternative development model firmly anchored in the SDGs and that the COVID-19 crisis is the opportunity to get it right.

Stefano Mallia, Chair of the Employers’ Group, said that with new priorities such as the EU’s Green Deal, NextGenerationEU, a just transition and climate neutrality by 2050, we would have a whole set of new indicators to consult. To deliver high-quality jobs and sustainable growth, we needed two pillars: a strong and resilient industrial base to stay at the forefront of global technology and innovation, as well as open markets and a multilateral system. based on rules that safeguard EU interests and values.

Olivier Röpke, president of the workers’ group, said that following the firm commitment to the goals of the social pillar at the Porto summit, the welfare economy should also take into account workers and their families, ensuring decent wages, strong collective bargaining and worker participation to manage green and digital transitions. He added that economic recovery would have to go hand in hand with social welfare if it was to be sustainable.

Recently, Peter Schmidt, president of the section for agriculture, rural development and the environment (NAT) and rapporteur for the EESC opinion on The sustainable economy we need, concluded by saying that an economy of well-being is based on service to people and that the EU must seize the opportunity offered by the pandemic to reflect on our weaknesses and make proposals.


Source link

]]>
LNER breaks social distancing on trains between Scotland and England https://www.sociologyesoscience.com/lner-breaks-social-distancing-on-trains-between-scotland-and-england/ Mon, 19 Jul 2021 14:22:00 +0000 https://www.sociologyesoscience.com/lner-breaks-social-distancing-on-trains-between-scotland-and-england/ Social distancing has been removed on all LNER trains running between Scotland and England, despite different rules on either side of the border. The rail company said it would operate its services under ‘English guidance’, meaning that from Monday passengers could be seated next to each other. A spokesperson later confirmed I that this applied […]]]>

Social distancing has been removed on all LNER trains running between Scotland and England, despite different rules on either side of the border.

The rail company said it would operate its services under ‘English guidance’, meaning that from Monday passengers could be seated next to each other.

A spokesperson later confirmed I that this applied to all of its cross-border services, whether originating in Scotland or England.

The decision has been made although the rules in Scotland are different, with a social distancing of 1m still in place in all indoor public spaces, including public transport.

Read more

UK heads for ‘biggest wave of Covid we have ever seen’, says government adviser as he urges ‘great caution’

LNER also asks customers to continue to wear face covers on its trains, although this is only a legal requirement in Scotland and not England.

The social distancing policy was attacked by Michael Matheson, the Scottish Transport Secretary, who called it “unacceptable”.

“LNER services operating in Scotland must comply with the Scottish Government’s public health guidelines. I have asked Transport Scotland officials to discuss this with LNER, ”he added.

Angus Robertson, Scotland’s constitutional secretary and another member of Nicola Sturgeon’s cabinet, also criticized the decision.

“LNER is a British government owned railway company,” he said. ‘Does he still maintain that when he operates in Scotland he is going to ignore Scottish coronavirus public health and safety rules?

“It’s as tenable as Boris Johnson’s exemption from the social distancing rules.”

the SNP MP John Nicolson also criticized company policies, describing it as “unacceptable”.

“When you are in Scotland your duty is to follow the guidelines of the Scottish Government,” he added. “You can’t choose the rules and recommendations that you follow. “

Twitter user Tamsin Russell said she was “completely confused and stunned” by LNER’s policy on the matter and challenged the company to justify it.

In response to his Tweet, LNER said, “We have made the decision to operate under English leadership, regarding social distancing on cross-border services, to ensure customer consistency. Therefore, customers can be seated side by side when traveling from July 19. “

A spokesperson for LNER later added: ‘Although social distancing guidelines remain in place in Scotland, we have made the decision to apply the same seating / booking approach to all of our services, including our cross-border services. , to ensure a consistent experience for customers. “

He added that most seats on LNER services would still require reservations, to give passengers “reassurance that trains will not be overcrowded.”

“To protect the flexibility of the reservationless railroad, there will be a number of non-reserved seats in car C for standard and a number of places in car M in first class, or car E in first class in a five-car train, “he said.

“Customers without a reservation will be able to travel in these unreserved areas of the train. To ensure that customers can travel with confidence, LNER continues to deliver record levels of improved cleaning on board its trains and at stations. “

The Scottish government has been contacted for comment.



Source link

]]>
Will Child Tax Credit Audits Become Permanent? https://www.sociologyesoscience.com/will-child-tax-credit-audits-become-permanent/ Sun, 18 Jul 2021 17:34:54 +0000 https://www.sociologyesoscience.com/will-child-tax-credit-audits-become-permanent/ (NEXSTAR) – Parents of around 60 million American children have started receiving child tax credit payments from the IRS this week in a decision that is expected to raise millions of families above the poverty line for the remainder of 2021. As many parents now know, the payments differ from stimulus checks in that they […]]]>

(NEXSTAR) – Parents of around 60 million American children have started receiving child tax credit payments from the IRS this week in a decision that is expected to raise millions of families above the poverty line for the remainder of 2021.

As many parents now know, the payments differ from stimulus checks in that they are not entirely new funds, but rather an early payment on the child tax credit that parents were already deducting from their taxes in the past. time of declaration. The total credit value has been increased for 2021 as part of the Biden administration’s US bailout. This year, parents receive half of the funds in advance and the rest when the deposit is made next spring. This means that monthly check payments will expire in early 2022.

A growing number of lawmakers are speaking out in favor of making monthly cash injections a long-term benefit for parents, but there is also fierce opposition to adding new spending as a result of costly rescue efforts in the event. pandemic and inflation fears.

Here’s where the debate stands until mid-July:

Why do some want to make CTC payments permanent?

Extended Child Tax Credits are fully refundable, meaning parents with no annual tax burden can still benefit from the infusion, creating a reliable income stream for very low income families. According to a study by the Center on Poverty and Social Policy at Columbia University, monthly checks will raise 45% of poor children above the poverty line.

“This is a very important program that will go a long way to alleviating child poverty, which has been a hugely significant problem in the United States,” Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said. says NPR this week.

Research from 2011 suggests that such infusions of tax credits can help assess the averages of low-income students, potentially providing better opportunities for academic and career success while making food and other necessities more accessible.

What is the argument against maintaining child tax credit payments?

Permanent child tax credits have some bipartisan support, and the idea actually has its roots in the Republican Nixon administration. But permanent credit has detractors, mainly from the center and the right of the political spectrum. The most obvious concern is the increase in costs. Some lawmakers have expressed support for a package that includes permanent credits, as long as they are paid. This could mean raising taxes, which could create political problems. The program costs around $ 100 billion a year, according to the the Wall Street newspaper.

Others believe that the payments – which some have described as social security for children – simply solve a short-term poverty problem while at the same time discourage parents to move forward in the workplace. Many social programs – including current CTC checks – offer lower benefits to higher income earners. Critics say parents might become less inclined to pursue careers if it costs them such benefits.

Where are the efforts to extend payments beyond 2021?

The Biden administration is pushing to extend the credits until 2025 and hopes to make them permanent by raising taxes for people earning more than $ 400,000 a year. Republicans, including Senators Marco Rubio (Florida) and Mike Lee (Utah), have already offered their own family support plans, which include such employment-related credits. Senator Mitt Romney (Utah) also led a charge for a simplified family allowance.

Monthly checks are expected to be popular with voters, and a battle over what the extension looks like could put Republicans in a difficult position on a widely popular program.

“When the renewal is complete, Republicans will be in the awkward position of opposing family payments made through a loan that they initiated and championed as recently as 2017,” Samuel Hammond said. , director of poverty and welfare policy at the Niskanen Center. the Associated Press earlier this year. “The alternative is to go along with a plan B.”

While many Republicans are considering a term extension, their priorities might not be factored into the final proposal.

This week’s report suggests Democrats are continuing to extend credit through a massive $ 3.5 trillion budget reconciliation proposal, a move that would allow the package to pass without government backing. GOP in the Senate.

While the move lowers the Senate voting threshold from 60 to 50, it will also tie the program to less popular elements of the Biden budget program. If this package proves difficult to pass, Democrats may have to think again about extending credit in a bill acceptable to both Democrats and Republicans.


Source link

]]>
Fairfax PTA leader ousted after wishing death on anti-CRT parents https://www.sociologyesoscience.com/fairfax-pta-leader-ousted-after-wishing-death-on-anti-crt-parents/ Sat, 17 Jul 2021 17:17:31 +0000 https://www.sociologyesoscience.com/fairfax-pta-leader-ousted-after-wishing-death-on-anti-crt-parents/ An official with the Virginia The parent-teacher association resigned after it was filmed saying that opponents of critical race theory can “die”. “Today, the executive committee of the Virginia PTA requested and received the resignation of Michelle Leete, who held the position of vice-president of training,” read a statement from the association on Saturday. “The […]]]>

An official with the Virginia The parent-teacher association resigned after it was filmed saying that opponents of critical race theory can “die”.

“Today, the executive committee of the Virginia PTA requested and received the resignation of Michelle Leete, who held the position of vice-president of training,” read a statement from the association on Saturday.

“The actions and rhetoric of Ms. Leete and all of the like-minded SB supporters are deeply disappointing. This speaks to a deep lack of concern for children and parents, especially when the welfare of children and families clash with political considerations, “read a tweet accompanying the statement.

The resignation comes after Leete was recorded at a rally Thursday denouncing opponents of critical race theory and saying, “Let them die.”

“LET THEM DIE”: FAIRFAX NAACP, THE LEADER OF THE PTA ATTACKS PEOPLE WHO ARE “ANTI-EQUITY”, “ANTI-SOCIAL JUSTICE”

“Deny this quirky group of people who are anti-education, anti-teacher, anti-fairness, anti-history, anti-racial … anti-opportunity, anti-aid, anti-diversity, [inaudible], anti-science, anti-change agent, anti-social justice, anti-healthcare, anti-worker, anti-LGBTQ +, anti-child, anti-healthcare, anti-worker, anti-environment, anti-change of admission policy, anti-inclusion, anti-live and let live – let them die! “Leete said in a video.

His comment was greeted with a round of applause from the audience gathered at Luther Jackson Middle School at the church of the falls.

“Don’t let these uncomfortable people deter us from our own march forward,” Leete, who is also NAACP vice president for Fairfax County, said of the counter-protesters.

VIRGINIA TEACHER SAYS COLLEAGUES “FEAR” TO OPPOSE CRITICAL BREED THEORY

The Virginia PTA added in its statement that it does not tolerate its language and said the group “upholds the values ​​of respect, collaboration and responsibility.”

NEW YORK MOTHER TAKES UP PROPONENTS OF CRITICAL THEORY OF RACE: “THEY ARE THE RACISTS”

“Although she does not speak in her role with Virginia PTA, we do not endorse the choice of words used at a public event on Thursday, July 15,” the statement said.

The Fairfax NAACP chapter did not immediately respond to Fox News’ request for comment on Leete’s ouster.

The resignation comes as parents across the country have gone viral in videos denouncing critical race theory, including in new York, where a mother told a school board to stop teaching “communist” lessons.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“My message to this district and to the members of the Council of [Education]: Stop indoctrinating our children! ”Tatiana Ibrahim, a Carmelite mother, said in the June video. “Stop teaching our kids to hate the police!” Stop teaching our kids that if they don’t agree with the LGBT community, they are homophobic! “


Source link

]]>
Free pre-K and community college included in budget plan https://www.sociologyesoscience.com/free-pre-k-and-community-college-included-in-budget-plan/ Fri, 16 Jul 2021 14:30:47 +0000 https://www.sociologyesoscience.com/free-pre-k-and-community-college-included-in-budget-plan/ “At the end of the day, it is a state responsibility,” said Mr Lankford. House Republicans, who denounced Mr. Biden’s plan when he proposed it, argued in a statement that “eliminating tuition and fees at the cheapest colleges in the country will not not solve the college affordability crisis. “ But Walter G. Bumphus, president […]]]>

“At the end of the day, it is a state responsibility,” said Mr Lankford.

House Republicans, who denounced Mr. Biden’s plan when he proposed it, argued in a statement that “eliminating tuition and fees at the cheapest colleges in the country will not not solve the college affordability crisis. “

But Walter G. Bumphus, president and CEO of the American Association of Community Colleges, said Mr. Biden’s plan demonstrates his in-depth knowledge of the barriers faced by the country’s 12 million community college students each year. . The first lady, Jill Biden, is a longtime community college professor.

“Eliminating tuition fees, increasing support for workforce training and providing the resources needed to increase student achievement and completion directly target these barriers,” said Mr. Bumphus in a statement, “and will help us eradicate them and pave the way for a better future for students, for communities and for the nation.

The Biden administration turned to Tennessee, one of the first states to offer a free community college program, for advice on its proposal. Its program, called the Tennessee Promise, offers ‘last dollar’ scholarships for students to attend community colleges and other two-year programs, essentially covering any remaining costs after they run out of financial aid. .

Shanna L. Jackson, President of Nashville State Community College, told reporters this year that one of the biggest lessons from the Tennessee program was that “free college isn’t free” and that students are often burdened with other costs like transportation, books, and child care.

“There is a very real cost to students in both urban and rural areas who have to reduce their working hours to be successful,” said Jackson, adding that the burden falls disproportionately on low-income and minority students. .

She added that there was also a “significant equity gap between black and white students” who enrolled through the state program. For example, among the 2017 cohort of the Promise program, 26% of white beneficiaries graduated in five semesters, while only 9% of black students did.


Source link

]]>
New tools – Bella Caledonia https://www.sociologyesoscience.com/new-tools-bella-caledonia/ Sun, 11 Jul 2021 11:12:59 +0000 https://www.sociologyesoscience.com/new-tools-bella-caledonia/ Perhaps more than most, the fields of energy and climate change in the UK have traditionally been dominated by the white middle classes; very smart people who rightly worry about the collapse of our ecological systems and the urgent work we need to do to reduce emissions, but who are less immediately familiar with the […]]]>

Perhaps more than most, the fields of energy and climate change in the UK have traditionally been dominated by the white middle classes; very smart people who rightly worry about the collapse of our ecological systems and the urgent work we need to do to reduce emissions, but who are less immediately familiar with the realities of poverty, inequality and poverty. injustice that are intrinsically linked to it. Even more radical militant spaces remain predominantly busy with people which are perhaps a click or two away from sustained social or economic hardship, portraying the broader field of the fight against climate change as a middle class concern. This in turn created an unnecessary gulf, between the privileged climate concerns perceived by middle class luvvies and the “real” concerns of social injustice and poverty that people face every day.

Of course, these are not separate issues. The causes and solutions to the climate emergency are fundamental questions of socio-economic justice. Although they represent only a tiny fraction of actual emissions compared to wealthy individuals and businesses, the poorest people face significantly worse health problems from air pollution; Pay disproportionate more for their energy bills and are at much greater risk of fuel poverty; face higher levels of exclusion due to dirty and inconsistent public transport (especially women, people with disabilities and people of color). Communities and workers are forced to rethink careers and local economies as the industry evolves and declines to meet new emission reduction targets. However, the people at the forefront of these socio-economic impacts, and of systemic injustices in general, are much less abundantly represented in climatic spaces. It’s a tragedy.

However, we do not completely neglect these questions of justice. Our concern often extends beyond broadcasts in the areas of equity and justice that are categorically inseparable from climate change. We talk at length about a “just” transition, about making sure that inequalities don’t get worse as we clean up our law and no one is left behind in the process. We have a bustling plethora of people across academia, politics and activism valiantly pushing to center this perspective. We also know that the work we do to clean up our energy, industry and transportation not only has social implications, but it also has very real social implications. potential too much.

It’s not just that creating a clean and expansive public transport system can reduce emissions; it can connect previously excluded communities and create new employment and leisure opportunities. It’s not just that insulating homes or adding solar panels can reduce our carbon footprint; it can lower the energy bills of some of the most vulnerable and lowest-income families, thereby alleviating some of the pressures of poverty. It’s not just that new green jobs can help clean up the industry; it can reduce unemployment and help keep these important relationships between industry, community and place alive.

Reducing emissions – what we ultimately have to do – is therefore a formative moment to also re-imagine social and economic systems in order to positively address some historical injustices, to make climate change work for “real” problems. social.

This is what attracted me to the field in the first place; the opportunity to make one of the world’s greatest problems serve another. This is a whole new set of policy tools for tackling the “real” issues of poverty and inequality that social policy makers and anti-poverty activists should also be able to get excited about.

Yet the break between the two lives on. We have not effectively reconciled love and “real” concerns. People at the forefront of these socio-economic impacts, and systemic injustices in general, remain grossly under-represented and excluded in the design and campaigning for climate solutions. Meanwhile, the inequalities between the winners and losers of the clean energy transition reflect these historically unequal trends in favor of capital and business, with communities, workers and people suffering injustice again being largely marginalized. . It is a systemic problem, but it is also a problem for which we must take some responsibility.

So there remains a basic and uncomfortable truth: there is not much that new tools can do for justice when the yard is still occupied by people who do not know what injustice is. We are a very white, very bourgeois group (not to mention the crucial work done by non-white working class people and communities, of course). This fact necessarily colors the solutions that we conceive and accept. At least in part, this is how we ended up with popular climate talks. focused on green consumption choices. We let popular discourse turn into a conversation about the decisions to be made by middle-income households, rather than emphasizing the need to organize for systemic change or seize social and economic opportunities for the class. workers and communities going to a net zero. the present economy. We dominated the climate discussion with middle class voices, which in turn allowed this discussion to be dominated by middle class solutions.

Yet I repeat: we understand the issues of justice. We know precisely where socio-economic inequalities and vulnerabilities lie and how they fuel and are fueled by the net zero transition. We have listened to communities and heard their concerns and incorporated them into our models, studies and campaign materials. All of this is fine and valiant. But it is far from sufficient. Understanding has not led to the redistribution of the power and resources that we ultimately need. We cannot come up with solutions that are truly successful for all sections of society if only one section can have the discussion. Moving to a net zero society in an equitable manner therefore means more than understanding justice issues: it means bringing more people who have experienced them intimately into the fields of policy design, academia, and activism.

We cannot bridge the gap to solve justice problems from a distance, even with the best of intentions, and putting communities under a microscope can only get us so far. Systemic change on the scale that is truly needed to tackle the climate emergency – and make it fair – is not likely if only the beneficiaries of the current system are engaged in the conversation.

We need to do better to bring people into the field who have actually had to make the choice between heating and eating (and dressing, having fun, and taking drugs all the rest); hire people from excluded and under-represented communities, even if they are not “qualified”; to make it viable for working class people who feel the worst social effects of climate change and injustice to pursue careers in mitigation, if we are to successfully mitigate it. I don’t mean “listen to the lived experience”. I mean bringing people with lived experience to high level spaces and giving them space to lead when they get there. From there, we can better advocate for real redistribution and justice, and craft solutions not only with working class concerns in mind, but with working class people at the table. This is not a new idea, and it is certainly not exclusive to climate, but it is something we have to do if we are to challenge the glamor image problem and truly seize this opportunity for the social and economic good.

We can also do better by diversifying to forge alliances outside the traditional middle class climate, energy and environmental circles. Climate organizations and researchers can, sometimes but not always, be quite insular. We are bad at talking to each other. When it comes to collaborating, we primarily (but not exclusively) work with climate and sustainability campaigns and build bridges with energy and environment ministries etc. This makes sense, but knowing that these spaces are largely dominated by the middle class and knowing that climate affects far more than climate, it can also perpetuate the cycle of exclusion and rob us of important information and collaborations.

To rectify this, we need to do better to build collaborations with lifelong poverty activists, community non-sustainability groups, social justice activists and unions and all of civil society. between the two. We need to sell the vision of social justice to “non-climate” and climate people. Big changes require coordinated action from a large church. If we want a just transition to be taken seriously, we must first take justice seriously.

. . .


Source link

]]>
It must be maddening for anyone struggling to find housing to rent or buy to see houses cluttered with paperwork. https://www.sociologyesoscience.com/it-must-be-maddening-for-anyone-struggling-to-find-housing-to-rent-or-buy-to-see-houses-cluttered-with-paperwork/ Sat, 10 Jul 2021 01:30:00 +0000 https://www.sociologyesoscience.com/it-must-be-maddening-for-anyone-struggling-to-find-housing-to-rent-or-buy-to-see-houses-cluttered-with-paperwork/ Every now and then the remnants of Celtic Tiger memories return to embarrass us, anger us, or both. Some never go away, especially when set in the concrete of your neighborhood with weeds mockingly flapping in the wind as 40 shades of rust create a feel of eternal fall. Phantom Estates were a gruesome and […]]]>

Every now and then the remnants of Celtic Tiger memories return to embarrass us, anger us, or both.

Some never go away, especially when set in the concrete of your neighborhood with weeds mockingly flapping in the wind as 40 shades of rust create a feel of eternal fall.

Phantom Estates were a gruesome and painful reminder of all that was wrong with tax and social policy and how weak the regulatory regimes supposedly control things.


Source link

]]>
How American Life Is Impacted By The Prosperity Gospel: Throughline: NPR https://www.sociologyesoscience.com/how-american-life-is-impacted-by-the-prosperity-gospel-throughline-npr/ Thu, 08 Jul 2021 04:01:47 +0000 https://www.sociologyesoscience.com/how-american-life-is-impacted-by-the-prosperity-gospel-throughline-npr/ Hide caption The prosperity gospel is a mixture of theology and capitalism which equates wealth with goodness, prosperity with virtue. He helped shape the larger ideology of American capitalism we live with today. Previous following Miami Herald / Tribune Press Service via Getty Images Hide caption Donald Trump and Dr. Norman Vincent Peale in 1988 […]]]>

In the New Testament, Jesus said that it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for a rich person to enter the kingdom of God. In America today, many Christians believe in something radically different. In what is called the prosperity gospel, wealth is a sign of virtue and favor from God. The effects of this belief can be seen throughout American life, from business to politics to social policy.

If you want to know more about the subject:

We love to hear from our listeners! Tweet us @throughlineNPR, send us a E-mail, or leave us a voicemail message at (872) 588-8805.



Source link

]]>